|
The Mayan Calendar: Saving the World, in Time
Mayan Calendar Experiment Results
Maya Elders and the Maya Calendar Project
The
Mayan Calendar: Saving the World, in Time
(*Originally published in the Momentum Magazine, February, 2001.
Also available: my CBC documentary, The
New Time)
I spent the second weekend of February 2001 at a Mayan calendar
seminar in Vancouver, British Columbia. It felt more like a sustainability
conference than anything else. I learned about community initiatives.
I discussed environmental, social, and culture issues. I networked
with dozens of people who are actively trying to make the world
a better place. This is because the Mayan calendar is part of
a youth fueled social movement that is trying to save the world
in time.
I'll go back a bit: The Maya lived in what is today southeastern
Mexico and northeastern Central America. They lived in large cities,
built huge temples and pyramids, and achieved advanced knowledge
of math, writing, and astronomy. Their civilization collapsed
around 900ce. Nobody is sure why. Much of ancient Mayan life is
a mystery, but we know they followed a complex series of calendars.
The most important was the 260 day Tzolkin, which consists of
a 13 day cycle and a 20 day cycle. Each day of each cycle has
its own special meaning. The two cycles move together like gears,
so that any combination is repeated every 260 days. The Maya believed
the Tzolkin was in "tune" with the cosmos, and it was
central to their spirituality, culture, and political system.
The Mayan calendar has become popular outside of Mesoamerica over
the past twenty years. An impressive amount of credit for this
goes to Dr. Jose Arguelles and his many books, which include The
Mayan Factor, Dreamspell, and Earth Ascending. Jose and his wife,
Lloydine, have traveled all over the world, spreading their vision
of a new approach to time. They came to Vancouver in February
to lead the 13 Moons of Peace Conference. About 300 people attended,
including members of dozens of progressive organizations from
around Vancouver.
Jose and Lloydine are globe-trotting activists. They discussed
disarmament, globalization, rainforest depletion, and myriad other
issues. They believe we can solve these problems by changing to
a new calendar. I was skeptical at first, but once I put aside
my problems with new-aginess, I started having hard-core, time
related epiphanies.
First important question: Who decided, or who's deciding, how
we relate to time? The biggest answers include Rome, the Vatican,
and the government, institutions that I've come to be weary of.
Next question: How tied is our perception of time to our perception
of everything else? This one is tough. The issue of time has been
spinning in my head enough that I intuitively know it's an important
issue. But when I fully try to dissect how my perception of time
affects my general perception, I get sucked so far back into my
own mind that I arrive in brain seizure territory, which is evidence,
to me, that time is very central to my experience of mind. I also
know that my perceptions of where I am in my evolution, and where
humanity is in its evolution, play a central role in my ability
to make decisions on a daily basis. I believe this is also true
for our collective social consciousness.
Next question: How much can a calendar affect our perception of
time? Theoretically, the Gregorian calendar is imposed over natural
cycles, which minimizes our ability to see natural cycles. It
is designed for material functionality (following the season's
and the work week), but it keeps us from seeing the full cyclical
nature of time, which keeps us
muddled. Basically, if we're
on Rome's clock, we're locked into a material way of seeing time,
and no amount of activism will keep us from slipping back into
materialism until we switch to a calendar that's designed to promote
sustainability.
Final question: Are the people at this conference onto something?
Just maybe. Many people, including accomplished activists and
artists, have told me that all will clarify once I start following
the Mayan calendar. They say it clued them into all kinds of patterns
they had missed before. Some said it helped them come into "synch"
with life. To paraphrase: This is a high-end meme.
Ultimately, the validity of this approach lies in trying it.
I've decided to follow the Mayan calendar for a year. Send me
an email if you
want to know the results.
Back to top
Mayan
Calendar Experiment: Results
During the Spring of 2001 I produced a radio documentary and
magazine article about the Mayan Calendar. I concluded both by
saying I would try to follow the Mayan Calendar for one year.
Below is my follow-up report.
I decided to follow the version of the Mayan Calendar popularized
by Dr. Jose Arguelles, an art historian and mystic who has played
an important role in bringing Mayan lore into new age culture.
This was a difficult decision, as his version of the calendar
is not in synch with the calendars followed by living Mayan shamans.
However, it the version followed by the individuals who piqued
my curiosity of the Maya in the first place, so it seemed like
a good place to start.
Following the calendar diligently proved difficult. Looking back,
I should have expected this; I have a hard enough time with the
Gregorian calendar. I mean, what's today? Tuesday? The which?
Who cares? My only saving grace was a computer
program that displays the Mayan calendar date each time I
turn on my computer. The result: I glanced at the Mayan calendar
date almost every day for 16 months. I didn't always pay that
much attention.
The 13-day cycle proved easiest to follow, and it did seem to
occasionally coincide with the natural cycles of my life. Sometimes
I found myself coming out of tangible periods of creativity, depression,
or transformation, only to notice that I was also just finishing
the 13-day cycle. Other times I would be feeling like I was setting
out on a whole new adventure, fresh and zesty and curious as to
what would come next, and lo, I would discover I was on day one
or two of a new cycle. This certainly isn't proof, but it is possibly
circumstantial evidence that the 13-day cycle occurs naturally
in my life. It could also be an example of the mind's ability
to notice patterns whenever they reinforce preconceived notions.
The 20 glyphs proved more difficult to follow, as they don't
mean very much to me yet. I made some attempts to learn more about
the meanings of the glyphs, but everybody seemed to think I should
develop my own intuition about them. This struck me as admirable
advice, but it was difficult to put into practice without a large
degree of commitment.
Ultimately, I just wasn't able to devote myself to the calendar
enough to yield any solid conclusions. Following the calendar
is a type of spiritual practice. Like many such practices, it
can be easy to take up (in a moment of inspiration), but hard
to maintain. Over the course of the year, some of my other practices
simply took priority. I hope nobody's too disappointed.
Meanwhile, the Mayan calendar continues to be part of my social
environment, as many of my dance
party friends are rigorous Mayan calendar adherents. I continue
to notice that Synchronicity seems to occur rather frequently
when I am with this community. I do not know the extent to which
calendric experimentation is playing any kind of causal role in
this. Any increased Synchronicity could simply be the result of
a high degree of open-mindedness and faith within the community.
Another spin on all this is my questioning of factual information
coming from Jose Arguelles, who publishes the majority of sources
of calendric information that my friends are using. While writing
my initial article I attempted
to research and verify some of the facts that Jose mentioned over
the course of his seminar (most of the facts pertaining to natural
occurrences of the 13/20 frequency). Most of the facts were very
difficult to verify, as they are quite obscure. I was forced to
publish the article before finishing my research. Some of the
facts eventually proved false, which has left me somewhat skeptical
of Dr. Arguelles' work. I don't think he is intentionally misleading
people, but I'm not convinced that his methodology is very rigorous.
Ultimately I will have to research his work further in order to
form an educated opinion of his credibility. I may do just that.
I continue to believe that the usefulness of the Mayan calendar,
and new calendrics in general, does not depend solely on whether
or not they are based on natural phenomenon. (For instance: whether
or not the 13/20 frequency occurs naturally in the order of things.)
It does seem plausible that the way we relate to time, as individuals
and as society, has an effect on our individual and collective
psyches, and that changing and experimenting with our relationship
to time time could benefit our society. I've simply realized that
I'm not the one who's going to blaze that particular trail, as
it's not where my passions lie.
Back to top
Maya
Elders and the Maya Calendar Project
(I have come into contact with a woman who
is involved with group of Maya Elders. They have been researching
traditional use of the calendar. I have been kindly provided me
with the information below. For more information, contact Brenda
Wood.)
Throughout the times of the Spanish Conquest of the Mayalands,
Maya knowledge keepers maintained careful, thorough historical
records of events as well as of the Spanish priest and military
leaders they encountered. At the beginning of the Conquest, various
high-ranking priest were assigned to different regions of Central
America and Mexico to oversee the King's strategic operations.
The priest assigned to the Yucatan was a Franciscan named Diego
de Landa, second highest of the Inquisitors. He had asked to be
sent to America and, once there, took it upon himself to burn
approximately 10,000 Maya codices and other writings. After de
Landa accomplished his mission, he traveled to Spain to ask King
Charles for his reward. The King was not pleased, however, and
10 years later (in 1573) sent de Landa back to the Yucatan to
restore the knowledge he had destroyed. At that time, however,
the Maya recordkeepers would not release this knowledge to those
who were not Maya. Therefore, de Landa drew his own conclusions
and published several works about the Maya records and culture.
Much of this work has been circulating ever since, including his
version of the Cholqij.
In more recent times, 25 years ago, Gerardo Kanek Barrios, an
Elder of the Maya Mam tribe of Guatemala, began his research on
the sacred Maya calendars. For 20 years, he traveled to many different
villages in Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, and Mexico searching
for the most traditional Maya elders, some of whom still live
in caverns. He discovered that, with a little variation in language
and names only, all of the calendars in use by traditional Maya
communities match up and continue the accurate record (count)
of days that the Maya have been keeping for many thousands of
years. The calendar distributed by the Maya Tiku project keeps
this count, and also reflects Gerardo's extensive research on
the most accurate way to depict each Ajau in symbolic form.
The Maya Cholqij Calendar for 2003 includes an introduction to
the "glyphs," an explanation of the ancient prophecies
of the Maya, and an extensive description of each of the 20 Ajau
and of the 13 forces of the Cholqij calendar. It can be ordered
by sending a check or money order for $25 (includes S/H) to:
Maya Calendar Project, 4603 NE University Village, #513, Seattle,
WA 98105
Back to top
|